By Anna Petrovsky
A female: expected to play with dolls as a child, wear
make-up and dress girly in the early life (teenager), and as she becomes older
be the main caretaker of the household.
A male: expected to play with trucks and soldiers as a
child, dress like a boy and play manly sports, and when hitting the adult hood
work to support his family.
Shouldn’t sex define the whole female or male objective? We
all know with what body parts we are born with, so why do we have to be categorized
into a gender. Is there really a right
and wrong way of doing gender?
When people see a
female or male they expect for them to be dressed in their own clothing (male=
suit, female=feminine clothing). What will people start to think if they see
someone breaking the norm of the gender code (a male in make-up, a female with
sweats on)?
Someone will get the mixed messages because it all seems
wrong.
This isn’t a way to define someone’s gender. Gender is based on a person’s behavior, or
look on life. If you have a girl raised by male, and a boy raised by female;
what are the chances that it won’t affect their thinking. The girl could come
out to be more tough and rugged, as for the boy he could be gentler.
Is this really a mores, the girl grew up with male figures
and they only know one aspect, same goes for the boy.
Just because society for many generations has categorized
the males and the females, does it mean we really have to be that way?
I don’t see nothing wrong with being a female and wanting to
do other things then clean or play with some dolls.
So….
What is gender? Define it as you define yourself.


















